Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-9700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1253 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Core i7-9700F
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $259.00 vs $500.52
- Up to 39% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-13900KF - $1.45 vs $2.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 18% better in No Man's Sky than Core i7-9700F - 212 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 32 vs 8 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
179
84%
Value, $/FPS
$1.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$259
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $259 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 397 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
212
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.36/FPS
61%
Price, $
$500.52
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for $500.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 396 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-9700F | vs | Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |