In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i7-9700F is slightly slower than the Core i5-9400F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $126 more expensive!
Core i7-9700F
- Is 3 months and 13 days newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 3 months and 13 days newer
Core i5-9400F
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 226 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Up to 51% cheaper – $119.99 vs $245.93
- Up to 51% cheaper
- Up to 52% better value in The Last of Us Part I – $0.53 vs $1.10/FPS
- Up to 52% better value in The Last of Us Part I
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700F vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
223 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
99%
Price, $
$245.93
48%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
48%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
226 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
169 FPS
100%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700F vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700F vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
9 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
87%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| $333.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
