In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-9700F is slower than the Core i5-13400F and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $15 more expensive!
Core i7-9700F
No clear advantages
Core i5-13400F
- Up to 29% faster in Battlefield 6 – 106 vs 82 FPS
- Up to 29% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer
- Up to 6% cheaper – $231.99 vs $246.81
- Up to 6% cheaper
- Up to 27% better value in Battlefield 6 – $2.18 vs $3.00/FPS
- Up to 27% better value in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700F vs Core i5-13400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
82 FPS
77%
Min 1% FPS
62 FPS
78%
Price, $
$246.81
93%
Value, $/FPS
$3/FPS
73%
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
106 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
79 FPS
100%
Price, $
$231.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.18/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700F vs Core i5-13400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700F vs Core i5-13400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
12 MB
60%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
98%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13400F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| $333.00 | MSRP | $196.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
