In Atomfall, the Core i7-9700 is slightly faster than the Core i5-9400F. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $229 more expensive!
Core i7-9700
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 214 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 months and 13 days newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 3 months and 13 days newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-9400F
- Up to 66% cheaper – $119.99 vs $349.02
- Up to 66% cheaper
- Up to 65% better value in Atomfall – $0.57 vs $1.63/FPS
- Up to 65% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700 vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
214 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
100%
Price, $
$349.02
34%
Value, $/FPS
$1.63/FPS
35%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
210 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
98%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700 vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700 vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
9 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
87%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700 Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| $333.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
