In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i7-970 is slightly slower than the Xeon X3470. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-970
- Is 10 months and 9 days newer – Jul 19, 2010 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 10 months and 9 days newer
Xeon X3470
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 242 vs 240 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 27% less energy – 95 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 27% less energy
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i7-970 vs Xeon X3470: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-970
Jul 19th, 2010
Average FPS
240 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
180 FPS
99%
Price, $
$229.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.95/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-970 vs Xeon X3470 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-970 vs Xeon X3470 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-970
Jul 19th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
96%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon X3470
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.933 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-970 Jul 19th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3470 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 19th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1156 |
| 130W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
