In Deathloop, the Core i7-970 is same performance as the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X. However, it's a slightly worse value for money, as it's $30 more expensive!
Core i7-970
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 130 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Is 7 years and 22 days newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Jul 19, 2010
- Is 7 years and 22 days newer
- Up to 13% cheaper – $199.99 vs $229.95
- Up to 13% cheaper
- Up to 12% better value in Deathloop – $0.91 vs $1.04/FPS
- Up to 12% better value in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-970 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-970
Jul 19th, 2010
Average FPS
220 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.95
86%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
88%
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
219 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
99%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-970 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-970 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-970
Jul 19th, 2010
Cores
6-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
87%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-970 Jul 19th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Aug 10th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 19th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $799.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | SP3r2 |
130W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
