In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-960 is slightly slower than the Xeon X3450. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-960
- Is 1 month and 11 days newer – Oct 20, 2009 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 1 month and 11 days newer
Xeon X3450
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 201 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 27% less energy – 95 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 27% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-960 vs Xeon X3450: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-960
Oct 20th, 2009
Average FPS
199 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
149 FPS
99%
Price, $
$132.34
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-960 vs Xeon X3450 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-960 vs Xeon X3450 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-960
Oct 20th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon X3450
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.667 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
92%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-960 Oct 20th, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3450 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 20th, 2009 | Released | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $241.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1156 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
