In Deathloop, the Core i7-960 is slightly faster than the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $650 cheaper!
Core i7-960
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Up to 76% cheaper – $200.00 vs $850.00
- Up to 76% cheaper
- Up to 77% better value in Deathloop – $0.90 vs $3.88/FPS
- Up to 77% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 130 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Oct 20, 2009
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-960 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-960
Oct 20th, 2009
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$200
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
100%
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
219 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
99%
Price, $
$850
23%
Value, $/FPS
$3.88/FPS
23%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-960 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-960 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-960
Oct 20th, 2009
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
87%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-960 Oct 20th, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Aug 10th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 20th, 2009 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $999.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | SP3r2 |
130W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
