Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-960 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-960 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 4725 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-960.
Advantages of Core i7-960
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $132.34 vs $495.36
- Up to 62% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 9 7950X - $1.15 vs $3.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 130 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 41% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-960 - 162 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-960 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-960 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 20th, 2009
FPS
115
71%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$132.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $132.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6887 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
162
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.06/FPS
38%
Price, $
$495.36
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $495.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6887 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 20th, 2009
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-960 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 20th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 170 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |