In Atomfall, the Core i7-960 is slower than the Core Ultra 9 275HX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-960
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 9 275HX
- Up to 30% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 30% faster in Atomfall
- Is 15 years and 2 months newer – Jan 13, 2025 vs Oct 20, 2009
- Is 15 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 55 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 58% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-960 vs Core Ultra 9 275HX: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-960
Oct 20th, 2009
Average FPS
189 FPS
77%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
77%
Price, $
$132.34
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-960 vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-960 vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-960
Oct 20th, 2009
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
64%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-960 Oct 20th, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 275HX Jan 13th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 20th, 2009 | Released | Jan 13th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | Intel BGA 2114 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
