In Atomfall, the Core i7-960 is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $158 cheaper!
Core i7-960
- Up to 54% cheaper – $132.34 vs $289.95
- Up to 54% cheaper
- Up to 40% better value in Atomfall – $0.70 vs $1.16/FPS
- Up to 40% better value in Atomfall
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Up to 33% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 33% faster in Atomfall
- Is 15 years and 4 days newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Oct 20, 2009
- Is 15 years and 4 days newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-960 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-960
Oct 20th, 2009
Average FPS
187 FPS
75%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
75%
Price, $
$132.34
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$289.95
45%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
60%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-960 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-960 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-960
Oct 20th, 2009
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
63%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-960 Oct 20th, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 20th, 2009 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
