In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-960 is faster than the Core i9-14900F and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $326 cheaper!
Core i7-960
- Up to 19% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 202 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 68% cheaper – $150.00 vs $476.00
- Up to 68% cheaper
- Up to 74% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.74 vs $2.80/FPS
- Up to 74% better value in The Last of Us Part II
Core i9-14900F
- Is 14 years and 2 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Oct 20, 2009
- Is 14 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-960 vs Core i9-14900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-960
Oct 20th, 2009
Average FPS
202 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
151 FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
170 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
84%
Price, $
$476
31%
Value, $/FPS
$2.8/FPS
26%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-960 vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-960 vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-960
Oct 20th, 2009
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
60%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-960 Oct 20th, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 20th, 2009 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
