Core i7-960 vs Core i7-14700F in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i7-960 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-14700F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $144.58 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i7-960
- Up to 49% cheaper – $150.00 vs $294.58
Advantages of the Core i7-14700F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 28 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
236
100%
Min 1% FPS
160
100%
Price, $
$294.58
50%
Value, $/FPS
$1.24/FPS
66%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-960 vs Core i7-14700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-960 vs Core i7-14700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-960
Oct 20th, 2009
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
8 MB
24%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
64%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
66%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-960 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 20th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
