In Deathloop, the Core i7-960 is same performance as the Core i7-10700F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $198 cheaper!
Core i7-960
- Up to 60% cheaper – $132.34 vs $329.95
- Up to 60% cheaper
- Up to 60% better value in Deathloop – $0.59 vs $1.48/FPS
- Up to 60% better value in Deathloop
Core i7-10700F
- Is 10 years and 6 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Oct 20, 2009
- Is 10 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-960 vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-960
Oct 20th, 2009
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$132.34
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$329.95
40%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
40%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-960 vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-960 vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-960
Oct 20th, 2009
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-960 Oct 20th, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 20th, 2009 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
