In Rust, the Core i7-960 is slightly slower than the Core i5-9400F and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $12 more expensive!
Core i7-960
No clear advantages
Core i5-9400F
- Up to 8% faster in Rust – 226 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Rust
- Is 9 years and 2 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Oct 20, 2009
- Is 9 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 9% cheaper – $119.99 vs $132.34
- Up to 9% cheaper
- Up to 16% better value in Rust – $0.53 vs $0.63/FPS
- Up to 16% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-960 vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-960
Oct 20th, 2009
Average FPS
209 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
76%
Price, $
$132.34
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
84%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
226 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
54 FPS
100%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-960 vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-960 vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-960
Oct 20th, 2009
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
89%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
85%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-960 Oct 20th, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 20th, 2009 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
