In Deathloop, the Core i7-960 is slightly slower than the Core i5-13400F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $82 cheaper!
Core i7-960
- Up to 35% cheaper – $150.00 vs $231.99
- Up to 35% cheaper
- Up to 33% better value in Deathloop – $0.67 vs $1.00/FPS
- Up to 33% better value in Deathloop
Core i5-13400F
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop – 230 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop
- Is 13 years and 2 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Oct 20, 2009
- Is 13 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-960 vs Core i5-13400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-960
Oct 20th, 2009
Average FPS
222 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
96%
Price, $
$150
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
230 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
173 FPS
100%
Price, $
$231.99
64%
Value, $/FPS
$1/FPS
67%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-960 vs Core i5-13400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-960 vs Core i5-13400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-960
Oct 20th, 2009
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-960 Oct 20th, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13400F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 20th, 2009 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $196.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
