The Core i7-960 is the comparison's loser – it's a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Celeron G3930T and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $178.00 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-960
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G3930T
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 82% cheaper – $39.00 vs $217.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i7-960 cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Core i7-960 vs Celeron G3930T for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G3930T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
169
100%
Min 1% FPS
113
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Core i7-960 vs Celeron G3930T in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-960 vs Celeron G3930T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-960 vs Celeron G3930T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-960
Oct 20th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.46 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Celeron G3930T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-960 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 20th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Kaby Lake |
130 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 2 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |