In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-950 is slightly slower than the Xeon X3430. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-950
No clear advantages
Xeon X3430
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 203 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 3 months and 6 days newer – Sep 08, 2009 vs Jun 02, 2009
- Is 3 months and 6 days newer
- Consumes up to 27% less energy – 95 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 27% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-950 vs Xeon X3430: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Average FPS
199 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
149 FPS
98%
Price, $
$31
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-950 vs Xeon X3430 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-950 vs Xeon X3430 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon X3430
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
84%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-950 Jun 2nd, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3430 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2009 | Released | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $189.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1156 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
