In Deathloop, the Core i7-950 is same performance as the Xeon E5540. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-950
- Is 2 months and 3 days newer – Jun 02, 2009 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 2 months and 3 days newer
Xeon E5540
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 80 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 38% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-950 vs Xeon E5540: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$31
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-950 vs Xeon E5540 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-950 vs Xeon E5540 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon E5540
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
84%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-950 Jun 2nd, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5540 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 30th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $774.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 130W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
