In Rust, the Core i7-950 is same performance as the FX-4350. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $52 cheaper!
Core i7-950
- Up to 63% cheaper – $31.00 vs $82.71
- Up to 63% cheaper
- Up to 64% better value in Rust – $0.14 vs $0.39/FPS
- Up to 64% better value in Rust
FX-4350
- Is 3 years and 10 months newer – Apr 29, 2013 vs Jun 02, 2009
- Is 3 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-950 vs FX-4350: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Average FPS
209 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
100%
Price, $
$31
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
209 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
100%
Price, $
$82.71
37%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
36%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-950 vs FX-4350 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-950 vs FX-4350 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
78%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-950 Jun 2nd, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-4350 Apr 29th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | AM3+ |
| 130W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
