In Control, the Core i7-950 is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $268 cheaper!
Core i7-950
- Up to 90% cheaper – $31.00 vs $298.98
- Up to 90% cheaper
- Up to 90% better value in Control – $0.12 vs $1.17/FPS
- Up to 90% better value in Control
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Up to 4% faster in Control – 255 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Control
- Is 15 years and 4 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Jun 02, 2009
- Is 15 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
Control FPS Calculator
Core i7-950 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Average FPS
245 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
96%
Price, $
$31
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
255 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.98
10%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
10%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-950 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-950 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
61%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-950 Jun 2nd, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2009 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
