In Rust, the Core i7-950 is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-14900KF. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $399 cheaper!
Core i7-950
- Up to 93% cheaper – $31.00 vs $429.99
- Up to 93% cheaper
- Up to 91% better value in Rust – $0.14 vs $1.51/FPS
- Up to 91% better value in Rust
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 35% faster in Rust – 283 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 35% faster in Rust
- Is 14 years and 4 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Jun 02, 2009
- Is 14 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-950 vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Average FPS
209 FPS
74%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
44%
Price, $
$31
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
283 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
93 FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.99
7%
Value, $/FPS
$1.51/FPS
9%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-950 vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-950 vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
56%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-950 Jun 2nd, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2009 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
