In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-950 is slightly slower than the Core i7-820QM. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-950
No clear advantages
Core i7-820QM
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 206 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 3 months and 21 days newer – Sep 23, 2009 vs Jun 02, 2009
- Is 3 months and 21 days newer
- Consumes up to 65% less energy – 45 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 65% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-950 vs Core i7-820QM: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Average FPS
199 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
149 FPS
96%
Price, $
$31
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-950 vs Core i7-820QM in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-950 vs Core i7-820QM in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-820QM
Sep 23rd, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.733 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
3.067 GHz
92%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-950 Jun 2nd, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-820QM Sep 23rd, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2009 | Released | Sep 23rd, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $546.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | None |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
