In Ghost of Tsushima, the Core i7-950 is slower than the Core i7-10700F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $214 cheaper!
Core i7-950
- Up to 87% cheaper – $31.00 vs $245.00
- Up to 87% cheaper
- Up to 85% better value in Ghost of Tsushima – $0.28 vs $1.85/FPS
- Up to 85% better value in Ghost of Tsushima
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 23% faster in Ghost of Tsushima – 132 vs 107 FPS
- Up to 23% faster in Ghost of Tsushima
- Is 10 years and 10 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jun 02, 2009
- Is 10 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Ghost of Tsushima FPS Calculator
Core i7-950 vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Average FPS
107 FPS
81%
Min 1% FPS
72 FPS
73%
Price, $
$31
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
132 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
99 FPS
100%
Price, $
$245
12%
Value, $/FPS
$1.85/FPS
15%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-950 vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-950 vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
69%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-950 Jun 2nd, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 130W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
