In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-950 is faster than the Core i5-9400F and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $89 cheaper!
Core i7-950
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 202 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 74% cheaper – $31.00 vs $119.99
- Up to 74% cheaper
- Up to 78% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.15 vs $0.68/FPS
- Up to 78% better value in The Last of Us Part II
Core i5-9400F
- Is 9 years and 7 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Jun 02, 2009
- Is 9 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-950 vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Average FPS
202 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
151 FPS
100%
Price, $
$31
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
175 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
87%
Price, $
$119.99
25%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
22%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-950 vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-950 vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
89%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-950 Jun 2nd, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2009 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
