In Atomfall, the Core i7-950 is same performance as the Core i5-680. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-950
No clear advantages
Core i5-680
- Is 10 months and 16 days newer – Apr 19, 2010 vs Jun 02, 2009
- Is 10 months and 16 days newer
- Consumes up to 44% less energy – 73 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 44% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-950 vs Core i5-680: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Average FPS
188 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
100%
Price, $
$31
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-950 vs Core i5-680 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-950 vs Core i5-680 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
86%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-680
Apr 19th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.866 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-950 Jun 2nd, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-680 Apr 19th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $294.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1156 |
| 130W | Power Consumption | 73W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
