The Core i7-950 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-6400 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $215.06 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-950
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-6400
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 79% cheaper – $56.85 vs $271.91
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i7-950 cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Core i7-950 vs Core i5-6400 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-6400
Jul 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
180
100%
Min 1% FPS
120
100%
Price, $
$56.85
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Core i7-950 vs Core i5-6400 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-950 vs Core i5-6400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-950 vs Core i5-6400 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.07 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.33 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-6400
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
99%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-950 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Not Available | MSRP | $182.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Skylake |
130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2133 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |