In Deathloop, the Core i7-950 is slightly slower than the Core i5-14400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-950
No clear advantages
Core i5-14400F
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop – 231 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop
- Is 14 years and 7 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jun 02, 2009
- Is 14 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-950 vs Core i5-14400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Average FPS
222 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
96%
Price, $
$31
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-950 vs Core i5-14400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-950 vs Core i5-14400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
71%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-14400F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-950 Jun 2nd, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-14400F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2009 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $196.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
