In Counter-Strike 2, the Core i7-950 is quite a bit slower than the Core i5-13400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-950
No clear advantages
Core i5-13400F
- Up to 58% faster in Counter-Strike 2 – 386 vs 244 FPS
- Up to 58% faster in Counter-Strike 2
- Is 13 years and 7 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jun 02, 2009
- Is 13 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Counter-Strike 2 FPS Calculator
Core i7-950 vs Core i5-13400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Average FPS
244 FPS
63%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
71%
Price, $
$31
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-950 vs Core i5-13400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-950 vs Core i5-13400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-950 Jun 2nd, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13400F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $196.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
