In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-950 is faster than the Core i5-12400F and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $149 cheaper!
Core i7-950
- Up to 20% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 202 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 83% cheaper – $31.00 vs $179.99
- Up to 83% cheaper
- Up to 86% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.15 vs $1.06/FPS
- Up to 86% better value in The Last of Us Part II
Core i5-12400F
- Is 12 years and 7 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Jun 02, 2009
- Is 12 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-950 vs Core i5-12400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Average FPS
202 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
151 FPS
100%
Price, $
$31
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Core i5-12400F
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
169 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
84%
Price, $
$179.99
17%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
14%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-950 vs Core i5-12400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-950 vs Core i5-12400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
44%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
76%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-12400F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
18 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-950 Jun 2nd, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-12400F Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2009 | Released | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $174.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
