Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600 outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600 is 4322 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600
- Performs up to 33% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-940XM - 118 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940XM - 12 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
FPS
118
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
100%
Price, $
$117.06
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $117.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-940XM | vs | Ryzen 5 5600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |