In Atomfall, the Core i7-930 is same performance as the Xeon X3450. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-930
- Is 5 months and 20 days newer – Feb 28, 2010 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 5 months and 20 days newer
Xeon X3450
- Consumes up to 27% less energy – 95 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 27% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-930 vs Xeon X3450: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Average FPS
188 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
100%
Price, $
$215
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-930 vs Xeon X3450 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-930 vs Xeon X3450 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
96%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon X3450
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.667 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-930 Feb 28th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3450 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 28th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $241.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1156 |
| 130W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
