Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i7-930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 4693 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-930.
Advantages of Core i7-930
- Up to 70% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - $144.98 vs $479.00
- Up to 28% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - $0.63 vs $0.87 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 139% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-930 - 550 vs 230 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i7-930 - 120 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-930 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-930 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Feb 28th, 2010
FPS
230
42%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$144.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $144.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
Buy for $479 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Feb 28th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-930 | vs | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
Feb 28th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 120 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |