In Atomfall, the Core i7-930 is slightly faster than the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-930
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 187 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 month and 21 days newer – Feb 28, 2010 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 1 month and 21 days newer
Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-930 vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Average FPS
187 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
100%
Price, $
$307.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-930 vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-930 vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
92%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-930 Feb 28th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 28th, 2010 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $332.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
