In F1 25, the Core i7-930 is slightly slower than the Core i7-4765T. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $192 cheaper!
Core i7-930
- Up to 38% cheaper – $307.29 vs $498.95
- Up to 38% cheaper
- Up to 37% better value in F1 25 – $1.79 vs $2.85/FPS
- Up to 37% better value in F1 25
Core i7-4765T
- Up to 2% faster in F1 25 – 175 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in F1 25
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer – Jun 02, 2013 vs Feb 28, 2010
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
F1 25 FPS Calculator
Core i7-930 vs Core i7-4765T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Average FPS
171 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
128 FPS
98%
Price, $
$307.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.79/FPS
100%
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
175 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
100%
Price, $
$498.95
61%
Value, $/FPS
$2.85/FPS
63%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-930 vs Core i7-4765T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-930 vs Core i7-4765T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
98%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-930 Feb 28th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-4765T Jun 2nd, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 28th, 2010 | Released | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | $303.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1150 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
