In Atomfall, the Core i7-930 is slightly slower than the Core i5-9400F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $187 more expensive!
Core i7-930
No clear advantages
Core i5-9400F
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall – 210 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 10 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Feb 28, 2010
- Is 8 years and 10 months newer
- Up to 61% cheaper – $119.99 vs $307.29
- Up to 61% cheaper
- Up to 65% better value in Atomfall – $0.57 vs $1.63/FPS
- Up to 65% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-930 vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Average FPS
188 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
90%
Price, $
$307.29
39%
Value, $/FPS
$1.63/FPS
35%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
210 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
100%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-930 vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-930 vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
89%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-930 Feb 28th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 28th, 2010 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
