In Atomfall, the Core i7-930 is slower than the Core i5-12400F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $127 more expensive!
Core i7-930
No clear advantages
Core i5-12400F
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall – 228 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 10 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Feb 28, 2010
- Is 11 years and 10 months newer
- Up to 41% cheaper – $179.99 vs $307.29
- Up to 41% cheaper
- Up to 52% better value in Atomfall – $0.78 vs $1.64/FPS
- Up to 52% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-930 vs Core i5-12400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Average FPS
187 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
82%
Price, $
$307.29
58%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
48%
Core i5-12400F
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
228 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
171 FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-930 vs Core i5-12400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-930 vs Core i5-12400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
44%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-12400F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
18 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-930 Feb 28th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-12400F Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 28th, 2010 | Released | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $174.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
