The Core i7-920XM is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-4820K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-920XM
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 55 vs 130 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i7-4820K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
Core i7-920XM vs Core i7-4820K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-920XM
Sep 23rd, 2009
Average FPS
165
96%
Min 1% FPS
111
97%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
171
100%
Min 1% FPS
115
100%
Price, $
$199.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
100%
Core i7-920XM vs Core i7-4820K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-920XM vs Core i7-4820K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-920XM vs Core i7-4820K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-920XM
Sep 23rd, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
80%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
54%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
82%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
10 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-920XM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-4820K |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
$1,096.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Ivy Bridge E |
55 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 10 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1333 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
None | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |