In GRID, the Core i7-920 is same performance as the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $35 cheaper!
Core i7-920
- Up to 27% cheaper – $94.00 vs $128.99
- Up to 27% cheaper
- Up to 27% better value in GRID – $0.19 vs $0.26/FPS
- Up to 27% better value in GRID
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 130 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer – Aug 31, 2017 vs Nov 17, 2008
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer
GRID FPS Calculator
Core i7-920 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Average FPS
483 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
291 FPS
100%
Price, $
$94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Aug 31st, 2017
Average FPS
483 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
291 FPS
100%
Price, $
$128.99
72%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
73%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-920 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-920 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
73%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Aug 31st, 2017
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-920 Nov 17th, 2008 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Aug 31st, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | SP3r2 |
130W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
