Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 5171 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Core i7-920
- Up to 52% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600 - $88.00 vs $185.00
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 327% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-920 - 94 vs 22 FPS
- Up to 51% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-920 - $1.97 vs $4.00 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-920 doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7105 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.97/FPS
100%
Price, $
$185
47%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7105 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-920 | vs | Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |