In Atomfall, the Core i7-920 is slightly slower than the Ryzen 3 4100 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $24 more expensive!
Core i7-920
No clear advantages
Ryzen 3 4100
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall – 211 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall
- Is 13 years and 4 months newer – Apr 04, 2022 vs Nov 17, 2008
- Is 13 years and 4 months newer
- Up to 26% cheaper – $69.00 vs $92.84
- Up to 26% cheaper
- Up to 35% better value in Atomfall – $0.32 vs $0.49/FPS
- Up to 35% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-920 vs Ryzen 3 4100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Average FPS
186 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
139 FPS
88%
Price, $
$92.84
74%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
65%
Ryzen 3 4100
Apr 4th, 2022
Average FPS
211 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
158 FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-920 vs Ryzen 3 4100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-920 vs Ryzen 3 4100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
73%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 3 4100
Apr 4th, 2022
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-920 Nov 17th, 2008 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 3 4100 Apr 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $99.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | AM4 |
| 130W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
