In Deathloop, the Core i7-920 is same performance as the FX-4350. However, it's a slightly worse value for money, as it's $11 more expensive!
Core i7-920
No clear advantages
FX-4350
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer – Apr 29, 2013 vs Nov 17, 2008
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer
- Up to 12% cheaper – $82.71 vs $94.00
- Up to 12% cheaper
- Up to 12% better value in Deathloop – $0.37 vs $0.42/FPS
- Up to 12% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-920 vs FX-4350: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Average FPS
221 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$94
87%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
88%
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
221 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
99%
Price, $
$82.71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-920 vs FX-4350 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-920 vs FX-4350 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
63%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
68%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-920 Nov 17th, 2008 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-4350 Apr 29th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | AM3+ |
| 130W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
