The Core i7-920 is the same performance gaming CPU as the FX-4130, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $35.98 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-920
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the FX-4130
- Up to 41% cheaper – $52.02 vs $88.00
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i7-920 cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Core i7-920 vs FX-4130 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-920 vs FX-4130 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-920 vs FX-4130 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-920 vs FX-4130 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.67 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
2.93 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-4130
Aug 27th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-920 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $112.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Zambezi |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
