In Control, the Core i7-920 is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $207 cheaper!
Core i7-920
- Up to 72% cheaper – $80.00 vs $287.00
- Up to 72% cheaper
- Up to 71% better value in Control – $0.32 vs $1.12/FPS
- Up to 71% better value in Control
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 4% faster in Control – 254 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Control
- Is 16 years and 1 month newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Nov 17, 2008
- Is 16 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Control FPS Calculator
Core i7-920 vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Average FPS
245 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
96%
Price, $
$80
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
254 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$287
27%
Value, $/FPS
$1.12/FPS
29%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-920 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-920 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
55%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-920 Nov 17th, 2008 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 17th, 2008 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
