Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 5447 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Core i7-920
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $88.00 vs $432.98
- Up to 77% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-14900K - $0.35 vs $1.50 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 16% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-920 - 289 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-920 doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
289
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.5/FPS
23%
Price, $
$432.98
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $432.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-920 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |