In Atomfall, the Core i7-920 is slower than the Core i9-13900KF. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $469 cheaper!
Core i7-920
- Up to 85% cheaper – $80.00 vs $549.00
- Up to 85% cheaper
- Up to 81% better value in Atomfall – $0.42 vs $2.23/FPS
- Up to 81% better value in Atomfall
Core i9-13900KF
- Up to 32% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 32% faster in Atomfall
- Is 13 years and 10 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Nov 17, 2008
- Is 13 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-920 vs Core i9-13900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Average FPS
187 FPS
76%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
76%
Price, $
$80
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$549
14%
Value, $/FPS
$2.23/FPS
19%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-920 vs Core i9-13900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-920 vs Core i9-13900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
51%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-920 Nov 17th, 2008 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900KF Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 17th, 2008 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
