In Rust, the Core i7-920 is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $170 cheaper!
Core i7-920
- Up to 69% cheaper – $77.68 vs $247.30
- Up to 69% cheaper
- Up to 65% better value in Rust – $0.37 vs $1.07/FPS
- Up to 65% better value in Rust
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 11% faster in Rust – 231 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Rust
- Is 10 years and 5 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Nov 17, 2008
- Is 10 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-920 vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Average FPS
208 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
40 FPS
68%
Price, $
$77.68
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
231 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
59 FPS
100%
Price, $
$247.3
31%
Value, $/FPS
$1.07/FPS
35%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-920 vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-920 vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
62%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-920 Nov 17th, 2008 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 17th, 2008 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $333.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
