In Atomfall, the Core i7-920 is slightly faster than the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-920
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 188 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
Core i7-620M
- Is 1 year and 1 month newer – Jan 07, 2010 vs Nov 17, 2008
- Is 1 year and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-920 vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Average FPS
188 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
100%
Price, $
$80
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-920 vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-920 vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
88%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-920 Nov 17th, 2008 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 17th, 2008 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $332.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
