In Rust, the Core i7-920 is slower than the Core i5-14400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-920
No clear advantages
Core i5-14400F
- Up to 23% faster in Rust – 257 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 23% faster in Rust
- Is 15 years and 1 month newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Nov 17, 2008
- Is 15 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-920 vs Core i5-14400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Average FPS
209 FPS
81%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
54%
Price, $
$77.72
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-920 vs Core i5-14400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-920 vs Core i5-14400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
62%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-14400F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-920 Nov 17th, 2008 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-14400F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 17th, 2008 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $196.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
