Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 5161 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Core i7-920
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $88.00 vs $849.99
- Up to 86% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-13400F - $0.59 vs $4.31 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 31% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-920 - 197 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920 - 16 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7385 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
197
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.31/FPS
14%
Price, $
$849.99
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $849.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7384 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-920 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |